Total Pageviews

Thursday, December 20, 2012

Reading Marx is like Reading the Economic News Now


Karl Marx and Capitalism Now

I have been reading Karl Marx’s, Capital: Volume 1 over the past year.  I’m using some great resources for my studies.  Most valuable of all is an online course “Reading Marx’s Capital with David Harvey.”  The web where this can be found is: http://davidharvey.org/.  The site contains a video lecture course that was delivered by Harvey to his classes at The Graduate Center of the City University of New York.  Harvey is a scholarly radical.  In addition to lectures dealing with Volume 1, David Harvey has delivered complete courses on Volumes 2 and 3 of Capital that can be found on the web as well.  Harvey has written A Companion to Marx’s Capital that tracks the course on Volume 1.  These tools have made Capital: Volume 1 more accessible to me.  It might help you as well.

I’m nearly to the end of Capital: Volume 1.  Last evening I was reading the chapter entitled, The General Law of Capitalist Accumulation.  I could not help relate the treatment of agricultural workers in England in the 1860’s to those of Walmart associates today.  The “agricultural proletariat” was not provided a living wage by the farmers and estate owners who employed them.  Therefore, it became the responsibility of the parish to make good the deficit.  Walmart, likewise, does not provide a living wage to its employees.  Associates look toward the federal government to  make up the deficit in the form of Medicaid and food stamps.  Thus the tax payers pick up the difference.  This “difference” becomes pure profit to Walmart heirs and stock holders.  This capitalist accumulation seems even more bizarre when it is understood that the Walmart CEO, Shelley G. Broader, earns 717 times that of the “associates.”  Moreover, the six Walmart heirs, in 2011, had a combined net worth equivalent to that of the bottom 30% of US citizens. 

This is only one example from my reading of Marx where he is more than contemporary.  Marx wrote about capitalism. 

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Israel ... The Most Dangerous Nation in the Middle East

Several rockets reach Israel from Gaza.  Israel responds with a massive, disproportionate bombardment

Israel is the most deadly threat to peace in the Middle East if not the world ... second only to the US.  The Palestinians have a right to defend themselves when their land is being captured and colonized by the Israelis.  The Palestinians are fighting Israel, the country that took their land and is continuing to seize more of their territory for illegal settlements on the West Bank.  Israel is breaking international law.  Israel, the only nuclear power in the Middle East, refuses inspections of its nuclear weapons facilities and refuses to sign the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty.  Why does the US stand by without saying a word as Israel continues to seize more Palestinian territory and attack their other neighbors, such as Lebanon, without provocation, again and again and again?  OH.  That's how the US got its territory. 

Our popular press tells us that Iran is the problem.  Actually Iran, in the past 200  years, did attack and seize some Arabic Islands … once.   However that was during the reign of one of the US's favorite dictator's ... installed in a US led coup … The Shah of Iran.  Iran also allows inspections of its nuclear facilities.  Who do you fear the most?

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Letter to President Obama - Don't Sacrifice the Entitlements


November 13, 2012

The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear President Obama:

Please do not sacrifice Medicare, Medicaid or Social Security in your upcoming negotiations with the Republican members of the House of Representatives and those of the Senate.  You not only won the election on November 6th, the voters overwhelmingly repudiated the Republican tax and budget plan, known as the Romney/Ryan plan.  Please don’t now install the Republican plan.  The plan lost. Their plan was repudiated overwhelmingly. You have more political capital than any president in near memory.  The voters want tax cuts for those making $250,000 to be rescinded.  We do not want the big three safety net programs touched other than to be enhanced.

Here in California voters passed an initiative that raised taxes on earners making more than $250,000.  At the same time sales taxes were increased.  This was done overwhelmingly.  The plan will raise $6,000,000,000 for schools.  You can do the same.  The voters also elected a “super majority” in both houses of our legislature.  You won the election.  Please don’t give away the crown jewels of progressive efforts.  We have your back.

Respectfully,

Dr. Stephen R. Concklin

 

Monday, November 12, 2012

Keystone XL Pipeline - Stop the Pipeline


Climate change is the most urgent crisis facing our world … the very survival of our children and grandchildren is in the balance.  Yet climate change was never mentioned once during the presidential debates.   The Keystone XL Pipeline, however, is a topic that was.  The pipeline is being built by TransCanada.  It has been sold as a means for job creation and for bringing more energy to the US.  Actually, the oil that will be forced at high pressure through the pipeline is not intended for the US.   And it won’t bring more permanent jobs to the US.  If previous TransCanada oil pipeline experience is any indicator, there will be plenty of clean up jobs at tax payer expense.

Will the Keystone XL Pipeline bring more energy to the US?  The truth is that the pipeline will deliver toxic Tar Sands oil to a refinery on the Texas Gulf Coast.  From there it will be shipped to South America and to Europe.  The pipeline is the means by which TransCanada plans to offload, right down the middle of our country, toxic tar sands oil mined in Alberta.   At this very moment the southern leg of Keystone is pushing ahead.  Family ranches are being seized in Texas.  But the worst part has to do with what will happen to the climate if this tar sands oil is burned.

James Hansen, the chief climate scientist for NASA, has declared that the burning of the huge tar sands oil deposit in Alberta will spell “game over for the climate.”  The Keystone XL Pipeline will be the fuse to a giant carbon bomb.   We have to think of our children and our grandchildren.   We have to urge the President to deny approval for the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline.

Monday, October 8, 2012

My Presentation before the Mt. Shasta City Council on Monday, October 8, 2012 supporting "the Move to Amend"


I’m Dr. Stephen Concklin.  I live at 308 NC Street here in Mt. Shasta.  I’m a retired educator.  I am also a member of the Siskiyou Progressive Alliance.

I support the Move to Amend: The National Campaign to End Corporate Personhood and Demand Real Democracy!  And I am urging that you, the city council, adopt our resolution supporting the “Move to Amend.”

In dissenting with the Citizens United decision of the Supreme Court, Justice Stevens wrote, ". . . corporations have no consciences, no beliefs, no feelings, no thoughts, no desires. Corporations help structure and facilitate the activities of human beings, to be sure, and their 'personhood' often serves as a useful legal fiction. But they are not themselves members of “We the People” by whom and for whom our Constitution was established."  I might add, as well, that they have no national loyalties.  There are no corporate borders.  It was recently reported that   corporation based in a foreign nations has contributed to at least one presidential candidate in our upcoming national election.

What could be just one of the consequences of the status quo for us here in Mt. Shasta?

The Daily Beast and Newsweek Magazine only today published an article entitled, The New Oil: Should private companies control our most precious natural resource?  We are talking about water.  At one time it was unthinkable that water would fall from the public domain.  Now, as privatization continues to eat up the commons, the threat to our water supply has become more than something to consider.  We already have a privately owned water bottling plant on our city outskirts.  The question I have is this.  How long will it be before our city water resource is commandeered by corporate interests?  Since Citizens United, corporations are able to use their unlimited monetized free speech to out speak the voices of any city, state or Federal agency.  Imagine the law suits which we, as citizens of Mt. Shasta, could find ourselves facing.  Finally, it must be pointed out that corporations have unlimited access to media.  We would just have ourselves.

I am urging you to support our Move to Amend resolution.

Thank you.

Vote “No” on Proposition 32

Proposition 32, also known as the “Paycheck Protection” initiative, is nothing more than a Trojan Horse.  It’s not what it seems.  It is meant to deceive.  It is written to give the impression that it will take the influence of money out of politics.  That’s not true.  It will, however, do what its promoters intended: it will weaken unions on the one hand and still allow corporations to pour vast sums into issues that will benefit them.  

If you are a union member, regardless of whether you work for a government agency or for private enterprise, this initiative takes away from you and your fellow union members the right to have a voice in the way your union gathers funds for causes vital to you.   Californians, by approving this initiative, will make that choice about your paycheck for you.  That’s not freedom.

Proposition 32 will also prevent corporations from collecting payroll deductions from their employee’s paychecks.  This won’t affect corporations.  More than 99% of corporations use their substantial corporate profits for political purposes … purposes that will insure even more substantial profits in the future.  They don’t need to use employee payroll deductions.  And they don’t need to ask their stock holders for permission either.  So Proposition 32 is nothing more than another attack on union members, workers and the middle class.  It was basically written by powerful corporations.

The model for Proposition 32 was developed by an organization known as ALEC, The American Legislative Exchange Council, according to documents obtained by the Center for Media and Democracy.   ALEC is organized by corporations who then meet together privately with our state legislators and write legislation. The public is never invited.  In this case Proposition 32 was written by and for corporate interests and presented directly to the voters through the initiative process.  So don’t be fooled by this well-funded initiative.  Vote “Yes” for freedom by voting “No” on deceptive Proposition 32.

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

The Deception by the One Percent


This week the House committee investigating the three to eight billion dollar loss reluctantly and belatedly admitted by J. P. Morgan Chase, did everything but call Chase CEO, Jamie Dimon, "Your Majesty", when he appeared for questioning.  This is exactly as the comparable Senate committee did last week. It's clear beyond a doubt, our elected representatives fear financial capitalists more than they fear us. Let's change that.
The challenge for us will be to counteract the illusions successfully implanted into popular myth by the corporate owned and controlled media.  Chief of these is the lie that government is the problem and not the financial capitalists.  Thus, the world has been turned upside down, as it were, by the corporate owned media’s successful establishment of the message that the worst economic crisis since the last depression was a result of too much government spending and regulation.  In actuality, the opposite is the case as illustrated time and again by Nobel Prize winning economist, Paul Krugman.  His most recent book, End This Depression Now, further describes what was learned from the "Great Depression."  That is, economic downturns require government stimulation of the economy rather than austerity.  This is the time for maintaining public employment of teachers, mental health workers and infrastructure maintenance personnel, to name just a few of the vital elements of a meaningful democracy.  Our infrastructure is crumbling.  Work needs to be done.  Workers are ready to restore our base.  Yet, the brakes are applied when the accelerator is most needed.

Clearly, when the facts are portrayed in a logical and consecutive manner, as we must continue to do in order to change this disordered perception, it becomes obvious that the crisis was a result of deliberate risks and gambles Wall Street took with our economy and our resources. The very same people who caused the loses, and consequently half of our current national debt, knew they could turn to the US Treasury for a "bail out."  This highlights the ultimate duplicity: corporate socialism for the ruling elites and free market fundamentalism for the 99%.  And all of this has been accomplished with assistance of our bought and paid for representatives in Congress along with a consolidated media owned by and managed for the One Percent.  Through the instrumentality of these manipulations the One Percent has successfully deflected the blame for their follies on “Big Government.”  And they will continue to do it in their movement to dispossess the 99% of its remaining wealth.  Their objective is to demolish the very little regulation and oversight that remains as a barrier to unlimited accumulation of wealth by dispossession of other's wealth. 
The public, subjecting themselves daily and hourly to corporate controlled media, internalizes this deception in the same way that it is manipulated to purchase laundry detergent, beer or deodorant.  Turn off the television.  Turn on independent media such as Democracy Now.  Read.  Get out on the streets and make news.  This is our country.  This is our world.

Friday, June 15, 2012

His Majesty

When I read about the appearance of JP Morgan Chase CEO, Jamie Dimin appearing before a senate committee this week,

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Keep Julian Assange Free

The primary reason that governments operate in secret is to protect themselves from their own citizens.  Like TOTO, Julian Assange has pulled back the curtain.  The wizard is not happy.  Julian is at risk of being extradited to the US where, experience leaves one to believe, he will be imprisoned indefinitely, perhaps tortured or even left naked as has been the case with Bradley Manning.  Sweden will be pressured to release Assange to the US.   In fact, it is my understanding that Hilary Clinton is visiting Sweden at this moment which forces one to ask, “When was the last time an American Secretary of State visited Sweden?  Julian Assange has not been charged with any crime.  Ostensibly he is being extradited to answer questions regarding allegations.  Like Bradley Manning, he is a hero. 

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

The Founding Fathers had Photo ID's?

So ... there were photo ID's in 1789?  Otherwise I can't understand how the "Founding Fathers" could have identified themselves.  No. The "Photo ID" requirement is a voter suppression gambit. Look in your wallet.  Now, remove your driver’s license.  Now, do you have a "Photo ID" remaining?  (Social Security cards and the like are not "Photo ID's.")  If not, you might want to pay to get one from a government agency for a small fee.  Consider this:  that minimal fee would be considered a large fee by people living in poverty.  Such a person might go for food and shelter first.  This is voter suppression pure and simple.  5,000,000 people are losing their ability to vote.  These are not members of the ruling elite.  Rather, they are the poor and disadvantaged, the very people who might not vote for conservative causes such as cutting food stamps and the like.

Monday, April 16, 2012

The Tea Party, GLBT People and Occupy

Tea Party Speaker Reportedly Tells LGBT Protesters: 'We Will Not Be Silenced By Faggots'

I responded to a comment elicited by the above named article:

Comment on Huffington Post April 16, 2012 2:00 PM PSDT. 

“Occupy protesters have raped each other, committed acts of assault, vandalism and have defecated on police cars, but one slur and the Tea Party becomes "racist and homophobic"?”

“Weird how that works.”

As I was answering the above post, I was told that it had been removed already.  But here is my response.

Turn of your TV, Fox News, no doubt, and visit some occupy sites.  The ruling elites will discredit any movement that has the potential of bringing in a new social order.  When I was at Occupy DC, they were feeding homeless people.  There was free library.  There was no rape and no illegal activity other than attempting to secure the commons ... a non-monetized island of freedom amidst a capitalist utopia.  Occupy Sacramento was also feeding homeless people.  Meanwhile, the local authorities raided a homeless camp on the Sacramento River.  The Sacramento City budget slashed $700,000 for homeless shelters.  Now the city is offering to come up with $255,000,000 to house the Sacramento Kings.

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

The War on Women

Mitt Romney has a problem here.  The Republicans have a problem here. This is because people are becoming aware.  Perhaps we are evolving.  First of all, the Republican stance toward women is based upon a patriarchal past where women in the west had practically no rights except the privileges open to them for economic and sexual exploitation.  Secondly, issues such as abortion, equal pay and, dare I say, equal rights amount to an effort by men to control women, to keep them under their authority.  After all, it is predominantly men who write and vote for legislation regarding women's reproductive rights.  Women are expected to obey.  If the war on women continues unabated, I can see the day when young girls will be emailing their Congress MEN for advice on feminine hygiene.  Really!  Wake up.

Thursday, March 1, 2012

US Ruling Elites to attack ancient Persian Empire

Imagine the US attacking another country ... It's easy if you try.  Meet you in Lafayette Park.  Thank God we will have another reason to cut onerous social services that keep pumping up our debt.  I guess if you  think you can only do one thing and you can do that one thing well ... then it is time to launch another war. 

Saturday, February 25, 2012

President Chavez Travels to Cuba

God bless Hugo Chavez. If you believe propaganda from the corporate controlled media, you are missing a few facts that need to be taken into account. 1) 2002 democratically elected President Chavez is briefly whisked away in a helicopter from the presidential palace as a US led coup begins. The media in Venezuela was at the time owned and controlled by the 1%, e.g., ruling elites. However, the citizens were getting calls from their relatives in places such as Spain that let them know what was really going on. The citizens of Venezuela stormed the presidential palace where inside the new president had just abolished the congress and the Supreme Court. President Chavez returned in the helicopter that has whisked him away to retake his office. Meanwhile the coup participants, including the coup president, escaped to a random location ... Miami.

2) At his second inauguration President Chavez read directly from the Bible and pointed out that Christ was an anti-imperialist just as he was. Well, the Roman Empire certainly thought he was. 

Saturday, February 18, 2012

.Rick Santorum: The White House is Not Biblical

Rick Santorum has declared that the White House is not following Biblical principles as he sees them.  It might be useful to perform a brief synthesis bringing together Biblical quotations and Republican Party principles.  Such a synthesis might read something like this. 

The Republican Biblical Plan to herald the coming of the Kingdom of God: I was hungry and you voted to cut off my food stamps; I was thirsty and you privatized my water supply; I was a stranger. You first imprisoned me and then deported me; I was naked and you raided my homeless camp and trashed the little I did have; I was sick and you cancelled my health insurance; I was in prison, and in the spirit of Christian forgiveness, you made sure that when I served my time I could never get a job, vote or be eligible for benefits.

Arizona Republican Sheriff Paul Babeu: I'm Gay


Arizona Republican Sheriff Paul Babeu is in hot water with the Republican Party.  And not just because he allegedly had an affair with a person from Mexico; but rather his difficulty is that his amorous fling involved another man.  On top of all this, his is further alleged to have attempted to have his boyfriend deported to prevent his gay trysts from being disclosed.  When confronted with these allegations by reporters, Sheriff Paul Babeu admitted that he was gay.  However, he then went on to protest that these issues were a matter of his personal choice and life.  Not so fast Sheriff: As it turns out, in Arizona as in my own state of California, my partner and I are not given that protection of "personal life."  Rather, our fellow citizens have disrupted the orderliness of our lives through "big brother, nanny state" interventions.  "No!  We will decide who you will be able to marry."  Government knows best.  Welcome Sheriff Babeu. 

Friday, February 17, 2012

Supreme Court Rules for Capital against Democracy

Today the Supreme Court continued to privilege capital over labor and states rights, of all things, by ruling that the State of Montana could not prevent capitalist domination of its elections by statute as the state has done for one-hundred years.  Thus, the court upholds the rights of capital to absolutely swamp any pretext of democracy in the US.  Citizens United lives on. The 1% are not going to relinquish their power over night.

Of course the Supreme Court has struck down this threat to thwart the free flow of capitalist power to dominate our democratic elections.  That's why the Justices are there.  They represent the capitalist class.  Not that it matters.  There is only one political party in the US: It is the capitalist party.  It has two right wings.  That’s the reason why it continues its rightward spiral.   And this is news?

Thursday, February 16, 2012

Stroke at 33. California State Worker Laid Off - Could not afford Blood Presseure Meds.

I'm seated here in the surgical patients' family waiting room at UC Davis Medical Center in Sacramento.  While waiting for my partner, John, who is having a procedure today, I have begun talking with Sonia.  She is waiting to hear about her thirty-three year-old son.  He was a custodian for the State of California until recently when he was laid off.  Of course, in accordance with free market principles, his medical insurance was terminated.  This was despite the fact that he suffers from high blood pressure and is required to take daily blood pressure medication that was prescribed in order to prevent a possible cerebral hemorrhage.  Then of course, when he became unemployed, he could not afford to renew his life preserving prescriptions. 

Sonia, his mother, was sharing, (we first met in the elevator), that her son suffered a massive stroke yesterday.  Because he is young and otherwise healthy, he has survived thus far.  Sonia awaits word of his prognosis.  This event highlights the truth that poverty is a death sentence.  Forty-five thousand Americans die each year due to lack of health insurance: That's fifteen 9-11's annually.  Odds are that Sonia's son has suffered debilitating losses from this stroke.  Accordingly, he may have permanent disabilities.  This is personal responsibility in action in America today with free markets for the working class and government sponsored socialism for the capitalist class.  The free market was spared the burden of providing a young man's medical care.  Now the citizens of the US are picking of the up the bill.  The thing is, I would have been willing to pay for Sonia's son's medical care that could have prevented this disaster through my taxes.  We need single payer medical insurance now.  Yes, a government program.  The free market is a killer.

Sunday, February 12, 2012

Andrew Breitbart's Eruption at Occupy

Andrew Breibart exploded in a volcanic like eruption Friday evening when he encountered Occupy Protesters outside the Marriott Wardman Park Hotel, scene of the 2012 Conservative Political Action Conference, CPAC, in Washington, DC.   As luck would have it, Emily Crocket, representing Campus Progress, found herself in a position to record the tirade that has gone the viral route on the Internet.  The Washington Times Columnist, Andrew Breibart verbally accosted the Occupy protesters as he repeatedly screamed at the top of his lungs "Behave yourself, behave yourself."  But that's not all.  He went on to describe the Occupy contingent as "freaks and animals." Before he was ushered away, he suggested that the Occupy movement "Stop raping people."  But why was Andrew Breibart, the astute conservative pundit, so disruptive that he needed to be led away by police into the hotel?  What did he understand?

The answer to this question is this: The Occupy movement reveals the class fault lines in America that the ruling elites continually try to prevent the working class from seeing.  The contradiction between the capitalist class and the working class, that must sell its labor in the labor market, has grown to the point of tectonic rupture.  The Occupy movement, much like an impending tidal wave, threatens the very existence of neoliberal capitalism.  Breibart gets this. 

The Occupy forces are not "behaving" compliantly.  They don't buy the lies that spew forth continually from the corporate controlled media.  Marx saw one primary contradiction within capitalism.  It is the necessary contradiction without which capitalism cannot continue.  This is the contradiction between the capitalist class and the people who actually create the wealth, the laboring class.  The media and the corporate government nexus seeks to create a docile working class.  Here is a question: The working class are taxed on their wage labor at rates of 30% or more.  The finance capitalists are taxed at just 15%  on their capital gains.  Why is this just fine?  How does this inequity persist?  Answer: The President is merely a place holder for the One Per Cent. He would be removed if he did not fulfill this function.  Just consider his economic advisers.  They represent the very core of the finance capitalists who provoked the current depression resulting in the current redistribution of wealth from the 99% to the 1 %.  When the banks fail, who pays?  Ask the Greek working class.  The members of Congress and the Supreme Court justices represent the ruling elites.  The 1%.  Citizens United merely reinforces the ruling elites hold upon the political process.  And the Occupy has a message.  It is this.  It is the utterly complete disparity between the 1% and the rest of us; it is the great contradiction that renders our economic system unstable.  It is the disparity between private property and the commons.

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Occupy DC and Marriage Equality in California

This week has had its downs and ups as Occupy DC was dispossessed of its commune space in McPherson Square, and the Ninth Circuit Court declared Proposition 8 unconstitutional.  Both of these events are relevant to me.  In November, when I was in Washington, DC for the Keystone XL Pipeline demonstration, I visited Occupy DC twice: once in the evening and once in the morning before I hopped the Metro to Reagan International to catch my flight home to California.  As for Proposition 8 here in California, both John and I participated in a candle light vigil in Sacramento that moved from the steps of the Capitol to the State Supreme Court building.  Then I attended a "Meeting in the Middle" rally in Fresno later in the summer of 2009.  In DC I was at the Occupy site in McPherson Plaza on the evening following our Keystone XL Pipe Line action.  It was joyous and fresh at the commune.  No rats.  There was spontaneous drumming and a young man danced in perfect rhythm to the beat in the subdued lighting that evening.  On the next morning I stopped by to have a cup of coffee.  I met my friend Theo and we policed the commune to pick up cigarette butts.  There were tents and Occupy members were just waking up.  I spent some time at the commune library and talked with the monitor of the commune central booth where I purchased an Occupy DC button.

Both the Occupy Movement and the movement for the extension of marriage equality to GLBT people cut against the grain of the ruling elites.  Occupy threatens the capitalist class power by modeling an alternative to class exploitation.  Gay rights is less of a class issue than one that is used as a wedge to divide and manipulate the working class.  As such, it remains a vital tool for maintaining capitalist class dominance.  The threat of Occupy becomes apparent when it is seen that Congressman Darrell Issa, Chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, found it necessary to call a special session of his committee in order to decry the threat of rats at Occupy DC.  Occupy DC was portrayed for the media as a health issue.  In reality, the only health that is threatened by Occupy is the class status of the capitalist ruling elites whom Congressman Issa serves.  I'm certain there are rats in DC.  Moreover, I'm equally certain that the permanent residents of our Capitol would appreciate the newly emerging interest in eradicating rats in their neighborhoods.  But that wasn't really the issue.

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Burning the flag ... Whose flag is it?

In Oakland, California this Saturday there was what is known as an "action" conducted by Occupy Oakland.  This action began as an effort to claim and inhabit an abandoned convention center in Oakland for gathering and for continuing the services that were terminated when Occupy Oakland's common space at Oscar Grant Plaza was lost.  Last year Oscar Grant Square, the site of the Occupy Oakland commune was evicted by police.  The functioning commune was a center for developing consciousness, for feeding homeless citizens, providing medical care and education.  These are services that the established community in Oakland is unable or unwilling to provide.  More to the point, however, the Occupy Oakland commune, in solidarity with occupies world wide, serves as an example of a demonetized alternative to capitalism.  Thus it is seen as a mortal threat by the ruling elites, the capitalist class.

The effort to occupy the abandoned convention center was repulsed with repressive force by the Oakland Police who employed tear gas and other forms of "crowd control devices."  Thus, Occupy Oakland was, in essence, told to just disappear.  The irony of the moment could not have escaped the marchers that evening.  Here were police protecting abandoned buildings while homeless citizens were being abandoned around the nation: Property trumps social justice.  The marchers, many of whom were kettled by police and then told to disperse, were not able to leave.  More than 400 marchers were arrested.  Meanwhile, a branch of the march managed to escape the police kettling and moved toward Oakland City Hall.  They reported that the door was open.  Some marchers entered City Hall and left graphite as well as performing minor vandalism.  The part of all this that the mainstream media focused upon was the attempted burning of a US flag.  Why was the US flag the target of burning rage?  And, more importantly, why has the corporate media ignored the primary goal of the march: the attempt to occupy an unoccupied building in order to restore to the Oakland Occupy commune a common space.

I think it depends upon what the American Flag means to you personally as mediated by your experience as a citizen of the US.  When I was a young boy, I remember getting goose bumps when I recited with the entire student body of my grammar school the Pledge of Allegiance.  The Pledge itself was written in 1892 by Edward Bellamy, a socialist.  That is why "justice for all" appears in the recitation.  Now I have come to understand that the flag that represents my government, my democracy has been captured by the ruling elites.  Money is power in our nation.  The wealthiest portion of our  citizens, the 1%, the capitalist class  owns our economic and political system.   They have fashioned a one-party system to serve their interests first.  It is the capitalist party.  It has two right wings.  So when I look at the American Flag I have to ask myself, "Is it my flag or has it been hijacked?"   Is it now being used only as a symbol to rally Americans into wars that they do not want, or to vote against their own self-interests?  I think you need to ask yourself the same burning question. 

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Anti-Camping Ordinace facing Occupy DC

The capitalist class, represented by Darrell Issa, is very much opposed to the concept of "the commons."  Rather, the only alternative for the ruling elites is " the privatized."  The occupy movement challenges this major operating premise of capitalism, e.g., the propertied have rights, the property less are given rights controlled selectively by the capitalist class.  Class consciousness is the crux of the entire issue.  The longer the occupy movement highlights the issue of class consciousness, the more the capitalist class will endeavor, by whatever means, to silence the 99%.


The problem with McPherson Square The story reported in Huffington Post today, is said to be "rats."  When I was there in November, I found people working together to promote the central message of Occupy, the gap between the capitalist class and the people who must sell their labor to them.  There may very well be rats in Washington, DC.   I recommend looking elsewhere than Occupy DC.

Sunday, January 22, 2012

Politicians Divide the 99% ... a Tool of the Elites

The GOP primary in South Carolina is history.  The results show us a few important things about how the ruling elites manage to persuade the 99% to surrender their power.  Romney, the undisguised patrician, seeks through his rhetoric to have the laboring classes identify with with the capitalist class.  This is done by promoting the gutting of the social safety net.  The message delivered, none to subtly, is this:  The reason your taxes are so high is that the people who do not want to pull their weight are living off of you.  "Let's get them."  Tax cuts that primarily benefit the ruling elites are great: The ruling elites are, after all the "job creators."  You need job creators so that you can have someone to sell your labor to.  The capitalist class has your interests at heart.  This message did not play well in South Carolina due to a resurgent class consciousness.  When Romney described, for example, his earnings from speaking tours totaling over $300,000 as "not very much," this laid bare his class isolation.  He has a "gated mentality."

Now Newt Gingrich, on the other hand uses rhetoric to foment divisions within the labor class.  Division is a tool for controlling and stirring up intraclass hatred.  President Obama is characterised, for example, as the "food stamp President."  This brings in race, class and fear of minorities taking something they are not entitled to.  Never mind that the majority of Americans using food stamps are white.  The math of demographics is too subtle to bother with in the heat of a campaign.  Gingrich also attacks public employees.  This is more division of the 99%.  One publicly employed custodian in a school, for example, could be "fired" thus leaving a wage for 30 school children.  Child labor laws should be eliminated.  They are an unnecessary barrier to capital accumulation.

My personal take on these two candidates vying for the Republican Party nomination is this:  They both employ strategies designed to divide the 99%.  You don't want the labor class to be angry with the capitalist class.  So you promote discord among the labor class itself.  Romney seeks to have the labor classes identify with the capitalist class.  The implication is that you could be wealthy if only all of the others of the labor class would just pull their weight. 


Newt, on the other hand, is just plain despicable.  He promotes divisions in the 99% having to do with ethnicity, public employees, children and gender.  In South Carolina, the state that started the Civil War and still flies the Confederate flag at the state capitol, Newt's rhetoric targeted the old divisions.  What do you call a person who can operate with the contradictions that pervade his life?  If he were a homeless person on the streets he would arrested and referred for psychiatric treatment.

The more subtle thing to acknowledge here is that the vaunted two-party system is, at bottom, nothing more that an elaborate means for dividing the labor class.  In essence we have but one party with two right wings.  It is the capitalist party.  This ruse may be coming unwound with the growing number of voters identifying as independents.  The occupy movement, which is international, has a perspective that goes beyond the outmoded instrumentality of parties.  Class consciousness is being given a voice.  "We are the 99%."  What is interesting to me is that the awareness of class is being constructed outside of the Marxist prescriptions.

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

The US Has A One Party System

When I was a young boy living in San Jose, I discovered  shortwave radio.  I learned that I could tune into stations all over the world  and listen to them right in my bedroom.  I became an amateur radio operator when I was fifteen.  But long before I earned my ham radio license and for years afterward, I listened by the hour to international shortwave radio stations.  Some of my favorites included Radio Canada, the BBC, London, Radio Austrailia, Radio Japan and countless others.  One international broadcaster I listened to frequently was Radio Moscow.  It was the voice of the Soviet Union.  There was a North American Service in American English.  I wrote to Radio Moscow and tried to understand as much as I could about the USSR.  I also knew that there was a vast difference between the USA and the USSR.  I could not understand how people could put up with living in a country that had a one-party system of government.  I always assumed that the United States had at least two parties that always privided a choice.

I remember too, coming home from school one afternoon to a speech on TV by President John Kennedy on June 26, 1963  It was his "Let them come to Berlin" speech.  The President painted a vivid and stark picture of the differences between a system that needed to build walls to keep its people in and the US where people were longing to get in.  I was young and impressionable.  Vietnam was ahead of us.  I came from a very conservative republican family.  I was very patriotic.  However, I was also quite afraid of the prospect of being drafted and being sent to Vietnam.  I wound up joining the Air Force and I served state-side as an electronics instructor.   All the while I followed politics and tuned in to short wave broadcasts where ever I was stationed.   I continued to listen to Radio Moscow.  I may have been open to the possibility that another way of organizing society was possible.  I harbored a inner faith that as good or as bad as life was in the United States, we always had options. We had choices between the two parties. 

While serving in the Air Force I received an education that I had not anticipated.  I read Thoreau's essay, Civil Disobedience.  I experienced an awakening of sorts that called into question my conservative political upbringing.  By the time I had served my stint in the service and returned home I was becoming radicalized.  Another world was possible although I never really thought of it in those terms until recently.  A major shaping inflence stemed from what happened  outside the major party conventions in 1968.  As a result, for me 1968 has always had a revolutionary aura surrounding it.  What is happening now with the Occupy Movement is something I have discovered I had been waiting for ever since 1968.  It has to do directly with the rebirth of class consciousness and the phenomenon of oppression.  The advent of Occupy came for me on top the US Social Forum in Detroit.  My partner and I attended the US Social Forum in Detroit during the summer of 2010.  There were 18,000 other activists there who also thought another world was possible.

During the last several years and especially after the 2008 Presidential elections I have realized that essentially, those of us living in the good old USA have just one-party.  It is the party of the ruling elites.  It is the capitalist party.  It has two right wings.  That's why it keeps spinning to the right no matter how we vote.  And our media are occupied by the ruling elites who continually, twenty-four hours a day, pelt us with the predominate ideology.  Free markets are essential for our freedom we told in an uncritical manner.  Capitalism is necessary for democracy.  If you are unemployed, then that is our fault.  

Monday, January 2, 2012

The Criminalization of Homelessness

I talked with a young man who lives on the streets of the city of Sacramento.  Never mind how he got there.  He owns nothing except those things he can carry with him.  He described for me the lengths to which he has gone to avoid standing all night on a sidewalk.  I won't go into detail.  On some cold winter evenings ice forms at his feet on the sidewalk.  "I nearly froze my balls off last night," he told me.  The anti-camping law in Sacramento makes it impossible for a homeless person to sleep in a sleeping bag or tent.  You can't even put your sleeping bag or tent down for a moment in order to use facilities or find food.  It might be construed as storing camping equipment on public property.  Public property is not "the commons."  You have to occupy a  structure that is legitimately recognized by city authorities as your "property."  Otherwise, if you are still young enough to remain standing all night freezing your balls off, you continue to pursue this icy alternative.  An older person would presumably topple over after a short while and be subject to arrest for camping on city property.  Poverty is a form of institutionalized oppression.  It is an artifact of capitalism.  Poverty is a death sentence.  It is the "death panel" that has always been part and parcel of the capitalist mode of production.  And the ruling ideology supports the notion that poverty is an acceptable phenomenon.  If you are poor your life is shortened considerably.  If you are elderly and homeless on an icy Sacramento street, then your death sentence will be carried out.  It's only a matter of time.

Property rights seem to be the key to legitimacy of personhood in Sacramento.  The homeless camp along the American River was dismantled this past week partly to appease property owners who were doubtless offended  by this unsightly manifestation of capitalist oppression.  I  have witnessed the debate revolving around the exact cosmic tic at which a fetus becomes a person.  However, if you own property then you have a status conferred upon you well beyond anything similarly conferred upon a fetus.  Alternatively, if you have the means to rent space in someone else's property, then you can have property rights by proxy as it were.  However, even if you had previously passed the "fetus" check, your poverty now deprives you of even basic human rights.  You must go away.  You have no rights.

Personhood, we were recently reminded, is conferred upon corporations, thereby effectually circumventing the "fetus check." Mitt Romney chided an occupy person who had the temerity to question the influence of corporations in the U.S. "Corporations are people, my friend." Rights are conferred upon a person through the occult status of property ownership.  Politicians are speaking today to the middle class.  That is to say, those who own property.  I'm old enough to remember a time when presidential candidates used to speak of "The War on Poverty."  Now it is simply "War on the Poor."  The poor have disappeared from the rhetoric of presidential politics.  This is a total dispossession not only of the right to claim a space, but, in addition, the dispossession of personhood.

The question seldom, if ever, arises in the main stream media as to whether our economic system could be democratized so that poverty could be erased.  Any attempt to suggest an economic democracy is dismissed as "socialism." In fact, we are moving further away from this solution by the privatization of health care, education, incarceration, social security and Medicare.  The cause of poverty, we are led to believe by the ruling ideology, is personal failure.  Moreover, the primary means for eliminating poverty is through charity which is another capitalist industry.  Charity is the institutionalized instrument that functions to ease the conscience and allow for the increasing disparity of incomes to continue.  Meanwhile we can avert our eyes and believe that things are just as they should be.  Profits are up.   Wages are depressed.  God is in His heaven.

The democratic alternative will come, but not through electoral politics.  Not through the political class.  It will come in spite of the capitalist class.  The contradictions that plague capitalist accumulation are growing beyond the tectonic breaking point.  Social unrest is inevitable.  Class consciousness is taking shape.  People are reoccupying the commons ... not just here, but in Egypt, in Europe and everywhere. There will be a commons once again.  People understand that human rights trump property rights.  It must be remembered: Oppression is never an accident.